This is an article that everyone needs to go through. The facts are these, that sometimes a nursing home will actually teach and train a new citizen or patient to be incontinent. How exactly does this happen? How can something like this happen in this day and age? I will kind here how this happens with an example of a forty-five year old female patient who entered a nursing home for short term care for therapy.
This is actually the story:
At the hospital, the patient was not incontinent, never had accidents plus was able to sleep and live without having wearing diapers, just like in the regular world. Then the hospital transferred the patient into a good nursing home to ensure that she could get short-term therapy to have an injury to her left leg. She’d need the therapy, physical therapy to be able to learn to walk again. She today had the use of only one leg.
Immediately when she got to the nursing home, the nurse, who would be caring for her, asked if she wanted to wear a diaper. The individual hesitated answering because she thought that question was odd. After all, the girl did not need a diaper, nor did she wants to wear a diaper. The nurse proceeded to say things like, well, in case you have an accident. The patient has been basically, politely talked into wearing a diaper while at the nursing home, though it was against her better common sense to begin wearing diapers at her age since she did not need diapers.
As in all nursing homes plus hospitals, when patients are putting on diapers, they are told to go in their diapers. After all, that is what a diaper is for, correct? So this patient, at times, would just go in the diapers, using herself to have a bowel movement, since she was wearing the diaper.
If you beloved this short article and you would like to get much more details relating to Home Health Care Massachusetts kindly stop by the website.
What it amounted to was that it had been easier to dump in the diaper than it was to get a nurse to come to help her out of bed, then help her to the bathroom. The patient grew to become increasingly afraid of falling and had been made o think that diaper would certainly stop falls and the diaper would certainly also stop the patient from phoning the nurse to help her to the bathroom. After all, make the nurse joyful because she is the one who will become around most, for emergencies and all.
But from the beginning with this particular nurse which talked the patient into wearing a diaper, the patient and probably many other individuals were put in diapers for the ease of the nursing home, not for that convenience of patients. The patient did in her diaper one day and the nurse became a little upset about what occurred, and then the nurse convinced the individual that she had an accident. Whenever indeed, the patient had no accident, but instead the patient dumped in the diaper BECAUSE she was wearing a diaper and because when the patients rang to get help, they had to wait and await someone to come and help them. Family members witnessed how long it got a nurse to come there one day, just to change the diaper. So the medical home gave so many mixed communications to the patients that the patients ultimately became confused as to why the heck they were in diapers to begin with.
Therefore , many times, nursing home patients are automatically put in diapers for comfort. The homes make the patients get rid of their dignity — they do not need diapers yet they are emotionally forced to wear diapers. This is a large, important issue that city officials need to look into. And when looking into it they have to realize that patients are reluctant to disagree with the nurses that give all of them daily care. So if a nurse even hints that a patient need to wear diapers, guess what? That affected person will be wearing diapers before you know it.
Initial, the diaper was put on for the sole convenience of the nursing house, and the patients were talked into wearing diapers IN CASE THEY HAVE AN accident. So patients complied by saying, okay, put me in a diaper. Yet what some patients did not understand was that by wearing diapers, that offered the staff more permission not to come quickly when the bell can be rung because the staff knows the sufferer in a diaper and they will not need to clean sheets if there is an accident. In other words, accidents are approved of, instead of having a patient in no diaper and rather than having a patient have to be escorted back and forth to the bathroom which usually TAKES more time for nurses to perform, they encourage the patients to wear diapers.
By wearing diapers, ambulatory individuals who just need assistance going to the bathing room, are encouraged to be LESS independent. They may be now encouraged to stay in bed a lot more simply because they are wearing diapers. The less bathroom trips, the more bed time, and the less bathroom trips, the less walking a patient does. After a week or so, the patients wonder why they are not as strong as they were when they were in the hospitals and no one makes the connection that the diaper is actually making them weaker and weaker because they are out of bed that many moments LESS. As each day in the diaper passes, the patient becomes less indie and more dependent on staff to change pampers.
This whole procedure is incorrect. There are SOME patients that need diapers because of medical reasons, but for the most component, many patients are simply talked into wearing diapers for convenience. It is insinuated that if they are wearing a diaper they do not have sheets accidents and it is insinuated and implied that the staff will be happier with the patient if the individual is wearing a diaper. Happy staff equals happy patient, correct? Incorrect. Just because the staff is delighted that they have so many less trips towards the bathroom, that does not mean the sufferers are happier. The patients are usually taught and trained to be incontinent and they are taught and trained to be happy that they are wearing diapers JUST IN CASE.
What happened to your relatives in the nursing homes? Were they put in diapers for convenience? Are they still wearing diapers? Do they seem less impartial now that they are wearing diapers?
We are not speaking about regular patients who require, who medically need to be in pampers because they are incontinent, I am speaking of sufferers who have not been and who are not incontinent, and these patients are politely convinced, persuaded by staff to be in diapers. And all the as the staff is politely insisting they wear diapers JUST IN CASE, the health professional says, if you want to, it is your choice. It really is your choice if you want a diaper. She claims that to the patient and continues stating IN CASE you have an accident. Basically, she actually is instilling the idea in a patient that will she will have an accident and it is much better for the patient to have a diaper. The individual agrees just to please a staff associate.
Yet the moment a patient agrees to please these staff members, that is the moment that the patient becomes less impartial. And is not the purpose of rehab to get the patient MORE independent? So the medical home is giving the patient the mixed message. The first message is that you simply are there for short-term therapy, and yet, you need to wear a diaper JUST IN CASE.
What about your relatives? If you comparable is there for short-term therapy and your relative is NOT in medical require of diapers, then should your relatives be in diapers? Probably not. IF there is no medical need for the diaper, why is the patient wearing a diaper? Other reasons, indeed, Virginia, the staff wants sufferers in diapers to prevent falls.
Why are there more falls with individuals who do not wear diapers? You can find more falls because when the bell rings, when a patient rings a bell for a nurse to come to aid someone to accompany someone to the restroom, the patient has to wait and wait and wait, and so frustratingly, a few patients, decide to get up on their own and walk to the restroom instead of waiting around so long for a nurse to come. Therefore patients learn that they will wait and wait and wait, so they much better have a diaper on. That is the intended message and that is the reality of the situation.